Lubricate and bleed influx behind cemented casing

Note: Original alert wording from IOGP Member Company.

Monitoring a well prior to removing the BOP stack is a critical operation that requires isolation, certainty prior to barrier removal. In the event that flow is observed before stack removal, kill methods will be limited.  
The following incident describes a familiar method of handling an influx behind casing where standard circulation techniques are not available. The Lubricate and Bleed method is one approach to managing an influx while waiting on cement, swapping out gas at surface for overbalanced fluid while managing pressure on the well.
The incident description helps highlight the importance of understanding fundamental well control techniques beyond standard circulation techniques and demonstrates the relevance of alternative kill methods. 

The well section was successfully drilled through drawn-down sand formations, the casing was run to setting depth and the subsequent cement job was pumped without issue. After waiting on cement to reach 50 psi compressive strength, the well, which was being monitored with the trip tank, showed a quick 6.8 bbl gain. The well was secured by closing the BOP. The well was monitored while cement continued setting to >500 psi compressive strength; initial SICP was 230 psi and increased to a stable value of 310 psi.

The well was killed using the lubricate and bleed method of well control, reducing SICP from 310 psi to 0 psi with 18 L&B cycles using 10.1 ppg NAF mud: 2 bbls/cycle lubricated (45 minutes wait time after each lubrication), 20 psi gas bled/cycle (30 minutes of monitoring after each bleed), total 34.75 bbls lubricated.

What Went Wrong?:

Charged formation and potentially insufficient lead cement slurry quality.

Corrective Actions and Recommendations:

Continued focus on well control during and after cementing operations with special attention to WOC and flow checking prior to the removal of BOPE for wellhead installations. The incident represents an example of why it should always be assumed that a well is capable of flow.

Certain regions have historically seen inconsistency in cement material quality; the incident highlights the importance of the quality of cement materials.

safety alert number: 318
IOGP Well Control Incident Lesson Sharing http://safetyzone.iogp.org/

Disclaimer

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither the IOGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient's own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.
This document may provide guidance supplemental to the requirements of local legislation. Nothing herein, however, is intended to replace, amend, supersede or otherwise depart from such requirements. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between the provisions of this document and local legislation, applicable laws shall prevail.