IOGP Well Control Incident Lesson Sharing
<<< Back to Results

Printable version

Misunderstood pore pressure, lack of vigilance and empowerment cause Well Control Incident.


Drilling 6" hole - just entering an identified reservoir - with 1.40SG mud weight (MW). The formation pressure expected was not well understood and a large uncertainty remained between a depleted reservoir scenario or a pressurized case (water injection on a mature field).

On the first stand into the reservoir, a circulation was performed in order to assess the gas level and the stability of the well, a maximum of 7% was observed. No flowcheck performed but a conclusion was made on a depleted scenario case. A drill pipe (DP) connection was then performed to continue drilling. 7m3 of gain were taken during the connection without been noticed. Drilling was resumed for a few more metres and significant flow increase & gain in active system was observed.

Drilling was stopped but the well was not shut in immediately. It took 5 more minutes to investigate the anomaly.

Shut in drill pipe pressure (SIDP) 450psi - shut-in casing pressure (SICP) 1160psi - 25m3 total estimated gain.

Significant gain volume generated serious difficulties to control the well.

Well was finally killed using driller's method with kill mud weight (KMW) 1.64SG.

What Went Wrong?:

Misunderstanding of the pore pressure prediction (high uncertainty expected between 0.98 to 1.51SG).

Wrong pore pressure diagnosis while based on non-valid gas criteria - the gas% criteria was not a pump-off event.

No flowcheck performed and anticipated in the drilling strategy to enter that reservoir.

Lack of crew vigilance, poor well monitoring during DP connections - first kick during connection not identified.

Basic well control procedure not properly implemented for kick detection and well shut-in. Driller not empowered to shut the well in without authorization.

Corrective Actions and Recommendations:

Enhance geoscience/drilling communication for a better understanding of the formation pressures and risks identified.

Review personnel competency.

Reinforce well monitoring and shut-in procedures with crew.

Review and identify risk of reservoirs artificially pressurized (suspect reservoir pressure boosted by water injection well in vicinity).

Figure 1: Well architecture

images

Figure 2: Late kick detection sequence of events

images


IOGP Well Control Incident Lesson Sharing 18-1


safety alert number: 300
http://safetyzone.iogp.org/

Disclaimer

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither the IOGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient's own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.
This document may provide guidance supplemental to the requirements of local legislation. Nothing herein, however, is intended to replace, amend, supersede or otherwise depart from such requirements. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between the provisions of this document and local legislation, applicable laws shall prevail.

IOGP
City Tower, 40 Basinghall Street
Level 14
London, London EC2V 5DE
United Kingdom